Author :
Abstract
In this study, the effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on a seismically isolated building were investigated. The 3-dimensional finite element model of the building was created in the SAP2000 software and the dynamic characteristics were determined numerically. Three different earthquake ground motion characteristics were selected to evaluate the structural behavior. Mudurnu and Sakarya station records of 1999 Düzce Earthquake were selected as far-fault ground motion. For near-fault ground motion, 1999 Düzce Earthquake Düzce and Lamont 1062 station records were selected. 1999 Düzce Earthquake Bolu and IRIGM 487 station records were selected as pulse-type ground motion. The behavior of the building supported by friction pendulum isolators with a displacement capacity of 48 cm was compared with the analysis results of fixed-base building. The displacement values of the 1st, 4th and 7th floors of the building were obtained. The effects of earthquake ground motions and isolator were evaluated according to floor displacement values.
Keywords
Abstract
In this study, the effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on a seismically isolated building were investigated. The 3-dimensional finite element model of the building was created in the SAP2000 software and the dynamic characteristics were determined numerically. Three different earthquake ground motion characteristics were selected to evaluate the structural behavior. Mudurnu and Sakarya station records of 1999 Düzce Earthquake were selected as far-fault ground motion. For near-fault ground motion, 1999 Düzce Earthquake Düzce and Lamont 1062 station records were selected. 1999 Düzce Earthquake Bolu and IRIGM 487 station records were selected as pulse-type ground motion. The behavior of the building supported by friction pendulum isolators with a displacement capacity of 48 cm was compared with the analysis results of fixed-base building. The displacement values of the 1st, 4th and 7th floors of the building were obtained. The effects of earthquake ground motions and isolator were evaluated according to floor displacement values.
Keywords
- [1] Yang D, Pan J, Li G (2010) Interstory drift ratio of building structures subjected to near-fault ground
- [1] Yang D, Pan J, Li G (2010) Interstory drift ratio of building structures subjected to near-fault groundmotions based on generalized drift spectral analysis. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30:1182–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.026
- [2] Somerville PG (2003) Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Phys. earth Planet Inter. 137:201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00015-3
- [3] Zou D, Han H, Liu J, Yang D, Kong X (2017) Seismic failure analysis for a high concrete face rockfilldam subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 98:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.031
- [4] Mahmoud S, Alqarni A, Saliba J, Ibrahim AH, Diab H (2021) Influence of floor system on seismicbehavior of RC buildings to forward directivity and fling-step in the near-fault region. Structures 30:803–817.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.052[5] Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2000) Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
- [6] Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001). Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. John A. BlumeEarthquake Engineering Center Stanford.[7] Liao W-I, Loh C-H, Lee B-H (2004) Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolatedcontinuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. Eng. Struct. 26:2173–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.016
- [8] Yılmaz D, Soyluk K (2019) Comparative analysis of steel arch bridges under near-fault ground motioneffects of directivity-pulse and fling-step. J. Struct. Eng. 2:63–74, 2019. https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2019.02063074
- [9] Bertero VV, Mahin SA, Herrera RA (1978) “Aseismic design implications of near‐fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 6:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105
- [10] Anderson JC, Bertero VV (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J. Struct. Eng. 113:1709–1724. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:8(1709)
- [11] Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthq. spectra 11:569–605. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828
- [12] Malhotra PK (1999) Response of buildings to near‐field pulse‐like ground motions. Earthq. Eng. Struct.Dyn. 28:1309–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1309::AID-EQE868>3.0.CO;2-U
- [13] Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2000) Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, Paper No. 2665.
- [14] Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2004) Strengthening of moment‐resisting frame structures against near‐fault ground motion effects. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33:707–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.370
- [15] Kalkan E, Kunnath SK (2006) Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings. Earthq. spectra 22:367–390. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192560
- [16] Mortezaei A, Ronagh HR, Kheyroddin A (2010) Seismic evaluation of FRP strengthened RC buildingssubjected to near-fault ground motions having fling step. Compos. Struct. 92:1200-1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.017
- [17] Sehhati R, Rodriguez-Marek A, ElGawady M, Cofer WF (2011) Effects of near-fault ground motions andequivalent pulses on multi-story structures. Eng. Struct. 33:767–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.032
- [18] Soleimani Amiri F, Ghodrati Amiri G, Razeghi H (2013) Estimation of seismic demands of steel framessubjected to near‐fault earthquakes having forward directivity and comparing with pushover analysis results. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 22:975–988. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.747
- [19] Moniri H (2017) Evaluation of seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings under near- field earthquakes. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 9:13–25, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-016-0145-6
- [20] Hamidi H, Karbassi A, Lestuzzi P (2020) Seismic response of RC buildings subjected to fling‐step in the near‐fault region. Struct. Concr. 21:1919-1937. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900028
- [21] Abd-Elhamed A, Mahmoud S (2019) Simulation analysis of TMD controlled building subjected to far-and near-fault records considering soil-structure interaction. J. Build. Eng. 26:100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100930
- [22] Güneş N, Ulucan ZÇ (2019) Nonlinear dynamic response of a tall building to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 17:2989-3013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00570-y
- [23] Bilgin H, Hysenlliu M (2020) Comparison of near and far-fault ground motion effects on low and mid- rise masonry buildings. J. Build. Eng. 30:101248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101248
- [24] Mahmoud S, Alqarni A, Saliba J, Ibrahim AH, Genidy M, Diab H (2021) Influence of floor system on seismicbehavior of RC buildings to forward directivity and fling-step in the near-fault region. Struct. 30:803–817.[25] Mashhadi S, Asadi A, Homaei F, Tajammolian H (2021) Seismic response of mid-rise steel MRFs: therole of geometrical irregularity, frequency components of near-fault records, and soil-structure interaction. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 19:3571–3595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01103-2
- [26] Quaranta G, Mollaıolı F (2018) On the use of the equivalent linearization for bilinear oscillators under pulse-like ground motion. Eng. Struct. 160:395-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.055
- [27] Wang H, Zheng W, Li J, Gao Y (2019) Effects of temperature and lead core heating on response ofseismically isolated bridges under near-fault excitations. Adv. Struct. Eng. 22:2966-2981. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219855914
- [28] Sodha A, Sandeep V, Soni D (2020) Seismic Response of Structure Isolated with Quintuple FrictionPendulum Bearing Under Directivity Focusing Earthquakes. Adv. in Comput. Methods and Geomec. 629-637. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_51
- [29] Yi J; Li J, Tsang H (2021) Tie-down cable-spring restrainers for seismic protection of isolated bridges. Struct. 33:4371-4384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.019
- [30] Abbaszadeh MA, Hamidi H, Amiri JV (2022) On seismic response reduction of adjacent frame: emphasison the different characteristics of earthquakes. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 20:91-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021- 00655-3
- [31] Li X, Tan P, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Li X, He Q, Zhou F (2022) Shaking table test and numerical simulationon a mega-sub isolation system under near-fault ground motions with velocity pulses. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 22: 2250026. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455422500262
- [32] Mahmoud S, Alqarni A, Saliba J, Ibrahim AH, Diab H. (2021) Influence of floor system on seismicbehavior of RC buildings to forward directivity and fling-step in the near-fault region. Struct. 30:803-817.[33] Somerville PG (2003) Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 137:201-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00015-3
- [34] Yang D, Pan J, Li G (2010) Interstory drift ratio of building structures subjected to near-fault groundmotions based on generalized drift spectral analysis. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30:1182-1197.[35] Zou D, Han H, Liu J, Yang D, Kong X (2017) Seismic failure analysis for a high concrete face rockfilldam subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 98:235-243.[36] Liao WI, Loh CH, Lee BH (2004) Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolatedcontinuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. Eng. Struct. 26:2173-2183.[37] Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001) Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures, John A. Blume[38] Akkar S, Yazgan U, Gülkan P (2005) Drift estimates in frame buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions. J. Struct. Eng. 131:1014-1024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:7(1014)
- [39] Malhotra PK (1999) Response of buildings to near‐field pulse‐like ground motions. Earthquake Eng.Struct. Dyn. 28:1309-1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1309::AID- EQE868>3.0.CO;2-U
- [40] Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C (2001) Comparing response of SDF systems to near‐fault and far‐faultearthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30:1769-1789. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.92
- [41] Design loads for buildings (1997). Turkish Standard Code 498, Turkey
- [42] TBEC (2018). Turkish building earthquake code, Ministry of Environment and Urbanization of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
